In Defense of the Semi-Smart Watch
I've always been a watch wearer, and with the advent of smartwatches I was keen to hop on the train and explore the benefits of having a small connected device on my wrist. My first “smart” watch was the original Pebble which was an amazing device with an e-ink display that lasted about a week on a single charge. However, I wanted to see what a full system on a wrist could do and bought the first Moto 360 and later the Apple Watch Series 4.
Both the Moto 360 and the Series 4 were great wrist computers – they showed notifications, did health and fitness tracking, as well had a variety of apps that extended functionality to things like navigation, calls, and productivity. But the one thing that they weren't great at ironically, was being watches. Both the 360 and the Series 4 had motion activated displays that only turned on when you twisted your wrist. And the battery – only a day's charge at most – meant I had to put them on a charger every night, and always had to make sure to bring a charger with me if I was going out of town. Finally, they were not very durable – the minimal water resistance and glass screens on both devices meant they weren't designed to withstand even some of the everyday activities that a fitness tracker or even a normal watch would go through, like bathing or swimming or manual labor. Over time, these limitations overcame the other benefits these watches brought. I yearned more for something like a modern successor the original Pebble that did some basic smarts like notifications, but actually functioned more like a real watch.
Enter the G-Shock
The G-Shock brand has been known for decades as a reliable digital watch designed to withstand the motions and elements of normal human activity and beyond. That's why I was excited to learn that Casio started dipping its toe into the smarts category with some of its models. I eventually decided to purchase the GBD-200, a variant of the classic G-Shock design with some nifty new features like an always-on MIP digital display, a step counter, and Bluetooth connectivity for time, step, and notification syncing. Plus, with the lower power usage – it promised up to 2 years of battery life on a single standard CR2032 battery. Was this the watch I was looking for?
The Good
At a high level, the GBD-200 has everything I was looking for. Bluetooth syncing so that notifications from my phone showed up on my watch with a quick buzz or beep. A basic step counter meant I could leave my phone at home and go for a quick walk or run and still track my progress. And the MIP display is beautiful – easily legible in ambient light and most importantly – always on. That brings me to the biggest benefit – battery life. Not having to worry about battery life whatsoever felt like a chain was released from me. I can throw it in a drawer for the night, or go an an extended trip and never worry about needing to charge it. And worst case if the battery did run low, it just takes a standard CR2032 battery that can be found at nearly any convenience store. Finally, even with all these features, it's still a G-shock so it carries the same durability as its predecessors – 200 meter water resistance, a rugged durable case, and shock resistance from bumps and drops. And of course it has the standard digital watch features – date tracking, alarms, and timers.
The Bad
Being a semi-smart watch, the GBD-200 does have its drawbacks. The MIP display, while power efficient, can only refresh about once per second – so millisecond-precise timers are out of the question. The notification syncing, while nifty, has its limits. There's little to no granularity to watch you can or can't sync to the watch. It's either phone calls, all other notifications, both, or nothing. There's no way to forward only specific notifications like messages or emails to the watch. And there's no customization of notifications either – everything is just a single beep or buzz.
Speaking of notifications, there is a bug where accumulating too many notifications on your phone without dismissing them can cause the watch to lose connectivity with the phone. Casio seems to acknowledge this and on the companion app suggests the only fix is to regularly dismiss your notifications. There doesn't seem to be any fix planned for it, so it's a big FYI if you plan on relying on this for critical notifications.
In Summary
Overall, the GBD-200 fits the niche that I really was looking for in a watch – straddling the line well between the features that we've come to appreciate from today's smartwatches while also holding on to the reliability that we've been used to from regular watches of the past. It's a good sign that I hope other watchmakers will take notice. Rather than trying to cram a small computer on our wrists that do everything at the expense of battery life and durability – rather carefully choosing the features that complement the profile well, making the humble watch continue to be a useful companion in an ever more digital world.